1            Alec Destry
             4835 W. 119th Street
2            Hawthorne CA 90250
             (310) 970-9087
3

4            Defendant in Pro Per

5

6

7                                     IN THE

8                          MUNICIPAL COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

9                              COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

10

11           THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE         )   No. T322404
             OF CALIFORNIA,                  )
12                                           )   JUDICIAL NOTICE: DEMAND
                 Plaintiff,                  )   FOR INJUNCTION AGAINST
13                                           )   TORRANCE POLICE DEPARTMENT
             -vs-                            )   AND DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL
14                                           )   OF ABOVE REFERENCED CASE.
               ALEC DESTRY, SUI JURIS,       )
15                                           )
                 Defendant.                  )
16           ________________________________)

17             This Judicial Notice answers the complaint, in the above

18           case, filed against Defendant on 22 September 1995.  Defendant

19           fully understands that the entire action in the above case

20           is fraudulent in its entirety (Exhibits A and B).

21             Based on Exhibits A and B, Defendant can easily understand

22           the Plaintiff's actions to wit the following:

23               (1) Plaintiff refers to itself as The People of the State

24                   of California and professes to represent the same.

25                   Plaintiff refused to allow this Judicial Notice into

26                   evidence unless Defendant had the above lie printed

27                   onto this Judicial Notice.  In reality, Plaintiff is

28                   an enemy of the People of the State of California and

                                     - 1 -

1                    represents the owners and stockholders of the Federal

2                    Reserve (ie. the International Bankers) as unregistered

3                    foreign agents no less (Attachment 3 of Exhibit A:

4                    Lewis v. US)! This practice in its entirety constitutes

5                    FRAUD and TREASON!

6                (2) The California State Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)

7                    does not have a license to do business in the State

8                    of California as required by California Government

9                    Code 53051.  In addition, the DMV is guilty of

10                   numerous other crimes (Exhibit C).  When Defendant

11                   personally advised the DMV director at the time of all

12                   of the above, Defendant received a response back from

13                   an underling which basically stated "pay up or else."

14                   This constitutes Extortion (California Penal Code,

15                   Sections 518 and 519).  The underling also incorrectly

16                   stated that the DMV does not need a license to do

17                   business in the State of California and cited

18                   California Government Code 53050 to support his claim.

19                   However, California Government Code 53050 is about

20                   the most contradictory piece of garbage Defendant had

21                   ever seen written anywhere and is an excellent example

22                   of the contempt all public officials routinely show

23                   the People of the State of California.  This is fully

24                   understandable in light of Exhibits A and B.

25               (3) During the so called traffic stop on 22 September

26                   1995, while Defendant was presenting Exhibits A and B

27                   to him, the so called Torrance police officer,

28                   Mr. Brian O'Steen, made the following verbatim threat:

                                     - 2 -

1                    "I suggest you stay in Hawthorne.  If I see you here

2                    again, I will have no problem taking your car."

3                    Amendment 4 of the Constitution for the United States

4                    of America and Article 3, Section 1 of the

5                    California State Constitution explicitly outlaws

6                    the entire practice to which Mr. O'Steen alluded in

7                    his threat.  In fact, had Mr. O'Steen followed through

8                    on his threat, he would have been guilty of Robbery of

9                    the 2nd degree (California Penal Code, Section 212.5).

10             Be advised that Mr. O'Steen is professing to be a Torrance

11           Police officer and professes to serve the People of the State

12           of California.  Mr. O'Steen, like all other government

13           officials in this country, is instead operating in secret as

14           a foreign agent of the Federal Reserve.

15             Had Mr. O'Steen actually followed through on his threat and

16           considering that ALL governmental agencies in the United States

17           of America have secretly forsworn allegiance to and do not

18           serve the People of the United States of America (Exhibits A

19           and B), where would Defendant have been able to have had

20           Mr. O'Steen prosecuted for the crimes of robbery, and TREASON?

21           Since Mr. O'Steen is professing to be a public official but is

22           in reality operating in secret as a foreign agent of the

23           Federal Reserve, Mr. O'Steen would also have been guilty of

24           treason as well as robbery (California Penal Code,

25           Section 37).  Do understand that Defendant being able to have

26           Mr. O'Steen, or anyone, including any public official, for

27           that matter, prosecuted for whatever crimes they may commit

28           is an integral part of Defendant's right to petition the

                                     - 3 -

1            government for redress of grievances guaranteed to Defendant

2            by Amendment 1 of the Constitution for the United States of

3            America and the procedure for doing so is given in

4            California Penal Code, Sections 834 and 837.

5              This court has forsworn allegiance to the People of the

6            State of California and has usurped the Constitution for the

7            United States of America and is thereby denying Defendant his

8            God given personal property rights guaranteed to Defendant by

9            the same.  Further, this court professes to be the only source

10           of remedy Defendant has for any actions taken against

11           Defendant by whatever corrupt public officials, including

12           Mr. O'Steen, that choose to do so.  This court also has the

13           unmitigated gall to state that its presence satisfies

14           Defendant's right to petition the government for a redress

15           of grievances.  The Constitution for the United States of

16           America is a contract between Defendant, and all governmental

17           agencies of the United States of America, including this

18           court and Mr. O'Steen.  This court and Mr. O'Steen have

19           violated their part of the contract.

20             Is this court saying to Defendant that Defendant has no

21           choice but, pursuant to the Declaration of Independence, filed

22           July 4, 1776, to take the law into Defendant's own hands and

23           to use whatever force, including deadly force, necessary,

24           either during or after the fact, to defend Defendant's

25           property against whatever armed thieves, including Mr. O'Steen,

26           would to try rob Defendant of it?  The only other option is to

27           permanently become an indentured slave.

28             Defendant prays for reason here and hereby DEMANDS that

                                     - 4 -

1            this court, by separate order, issue an INJUNCTION against the

2            Torrance Police Department and all other police agencies

3            prohibiting them from attempting to KIDNAP (so called arrest)

4            Defendant or to take ANY of Defendant's property, vehicle or

5            otherwise, and to instead, if they feel it necessary, to issue

6            Defendant a citation to appear in a court of Constitutional

7            Law, which is not in any manner influenced by the fraud and

8            treason as stated in Exhibits A and B, to settle whatever

9            matter they feel needs to be settled.  Then, Defendant hereby

10           DEMANDS that this court DISMISS this case against Defendant.

11           Signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United

12           States of America (ref. Title 28 USC, Section 1746) and the

13           laws of California State that the foregoing facts are true and

14           correct.

15                           Under Duress, Without Prejudice, UCC 1207

16

17                           __________________________________________
                             ALEC DESTRY, SUI JURIS, DEFENDANT.
18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

                                     - 5 -
Go to Discussion Forum.   Home.   Go to Internet Tidbits.
View this brief's 1st Exhibit.   View this brief's 2nd Exhibit.