1 Alec Destry
4835 W. 119th Street
2 Hawthorne CA 90250
(310) 970-9087
3
4 Defendant in Pro Per
5
6
7 IN THE
8 MUNICIPAL COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
11 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE ) No. T322404
OF CALIFORNIA, )
12 ) JUDICIAL NOTICE: DEMAND
Plaintiff, ) FOR INJUNCTION AGAINST
13 ) TORRANCE POLICE DEPARTMENT
-vs- ) AND DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL
14 ) OF ABOVE REFERENCED CASE.
ALEC DESTRY, SUI JURIS, )
15 )
Defendant. )
16 ________________________________)
17 This Judicial Notice answers the complaint, in the above
18 case, filed against Defendant on 22 September 1995. Defendant
19 fully understands that the entire action in the above case
20 is fraudulent in its entirety (Exhibits A and B).
21 Based on Exhibits A and B, Defendant can easily understand
22 the Plaintiff's actions to wit the following:
23 (1) Plaintiff refers to itself as The People of the State
24 of California and professes to represent the same.
25 Plaintiff refused to allow this Judicial Notice into
26 evidence unless Defendant had the above lie printed
27 onto this Judicial Notice. In reality, Plaintiff is
28 an enemy of the People of the State of California and
- 1 -
1 represents the owners and stockholders of the Federal
2 Reserve (ie. the International Bankers) as unregistered
3 foreign agents no less (Attachment 3 of Exhibit A:
4 Lewis v. US)! This practice in its entirety constitutes
5 FRAUD and TREASON!
6 (2) The California State Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
7 does not have a license to do business in the State
8 of California as required by California Government
9 Code 53051. In addition, the DMV is guilty of
10 numerous other crimes (Exhibit C). When Defendant
11 personally advised the DMV director at the time of all
12 of the above, Defendant received a response back from
13 an underling which basically stated "pay up or else."
14 This constitutes Extortion (California Penal Code,
15 Sections 518 and 519). The underling also incorrectly
16 stated that the DMV does not need a license to do
17 business in the State of California and cited
18 California Government Code 53050 to support his claim.
19 However, California Government Code 53050 is about
20 the most contradictory piece of garbage Defendant had
21 ever seen written anywhere and is an excellent example
22 of the contempt all public officials routinely show
23 the People of the State of California. This is fully
24 understandable in light of Exhibits A and B.
25 (3) During the so called traffic stop on 22 September
26 1995, while Defendant was presenting Exhibits A and B
27 to him, the so called Torrance police officer,
28 Mr. Brian O'Steen, made the following verbatim threat:
- 2 -
1 "I suggest you stay in Hawthorne. If I see you here
2 again, I will have no problem taking your car."
3 Amendment 4 of the Constitution for the United States
4 of America and Article 3, Section 1 of the
5 California State Constitution explicitly outlaws
6 the entire practice to which Mr. O'Steen alluded in
7 his threat. In fact, had Mr. O'Steen followed through
8 on his threat, he would have been guilty of Robbery of
9 the 2nd degree (California Penal Code, Section 212.5).
10 Be advised that Mr. O'Steen is professing to be a Torrance
11 Police officer and professes to serve the People of the State
12 of California. Mr. O'Steen, like all other government
13 officials in this country, is instead operating in secret as
14 a foreign agent of the Federal Reserve.
15 Had Mr. O'Steen actually followed through on his threat and
16 considering that ALL governmental agencies in the United States
17 of America have secretly forsworn allegiance to and do not
18 serve the People of the United States of America (Exhibits A
19 and B), where would Defendant have been able to have had
20 Mr. O'Steen prosecuted for the crimes of robbery, and TREASON?
21 Since Mr. O'Steen is professing to be a public official but is
22 in reality operating in secret as a foreign agent of the
23 Federal Reserve, Mr. O'Steen would also have been guilty of
24 treason as well as robbery (California Penal Code,
25 Section 37). Do understand that Defendant being able to have
26 Mr. O'Steen, or anyone, including any public official, for
27 that matter, prosecuted for whatever crimes they may commit
28 is an integral part of Defendant's right to petition the
- 3 -
1 government for redress of grievances guaranteed to Defendant
2 by Amendment 1 of the Constitution for the United States of
3 America and the procedure for doing so is given in
4 California Penal Code, Sections 834 and 837.
5 This court has forsworn allegiance to the People of the
6 State of California and has usurped the Constitution for the
7 United States of America and is thereby denying Defendant his
8 God given personal property rights guaranteed to Defendant by
9 the same. Further, this court professes to be the only source
10 of remedy Defendant has for any actions taken against
11 Defendant by whatever corrupt public officials, including
12 Mr. O'Steen, that choose to do so. This court also has the
13 unmitigated gall to state that its presence satisfies
14 Defendant's right to petition the government for a redress
15 of grievances. The Constitution for the United States of
16 America is a contract between Defendant, and all governmental
17 agencies of the United States of America, including this
18 court and Mr. O'Steen. This court and Mr. O'Steen have
19 violated their part of the contract.
20 Is this court saying to Defendant that Defendant has no
21 choice but, pursuant to the Declaration of Independence, filed
22 July 4, 1776, to take the law into Defendant's own hands and
23 to use whatever force, including deadly force, necessary,
24 either during or after the fact, to defend Defendant's
25 property against whatever armed thieves, including Mr. O'Steen,
26 would to try rob Defendant of it? The only other option is to
27 permanently become an indentured slave.
28 Defendant prays for reason here and hereby DEMANDS that
- 4 -
1 this court, by separate order, issue an INJUNCTION against the
2 Torrance Police Department and all other police agencies
3 prohibiting them from attempting to KIDNAP (so called arrest)
4 Defendant or to take ANY of Defendant's property, vehicle or
5 otherwise, and to instead, if they feel it necessary, to issue
6 Defendant a citation to appear in a court of Constitutional
7 Law, which is not in any manner influenced by the fraud and
8 treason as stated in Exhibits A and B, to settle whatever
9 matter they feel needs to be settled. Then, Defendant hereby
10 DEMANDS that this court DISMISS this case against Defendant.
11 Signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United
12 States of America (ref. Title 28 USC, Section 1746) and the
13 laws of California State that the foregoing facts are true and
14 correct.
15 Under Duress, Without Prejudice, UCC 1207
16
17 __________________________________________
ALEC DESTRY, SUI JURIS, DEFENDANT.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 5 -
Go to Discussion Forum.
Home.
Go to Internet Tidbits.
View this brief's 1st Exhibit.
View this brief's 2nd Exhibit.