Although all public officials have taken an open and public oath to support and defend the Constitution for the United States of America against all enemies, foreign or domestic, they have also, knowingly or otherwise, taken a secret oath that the People of the United States of America have all been pledged as property of the owners of the Federal Reserve, namely the International Bankers. Pursuant to this secret oath, our public officials have, since December 23, 1913, gradually, and in an extremely conniving, complex and underhanded manner, corrupted the law of the land to the point where the Constitution for the United States of America has been completely usurped (Attachment 1). What they have done constitutes treason against the People of the United States of America.
What the corruption of the law of the land boils down to is a fraudulent bankruptcy of the United States of America that has held sway over the Constitution for the United States of America since March 9, 1933. The starting point for this fraudulent bankruptcy is 12 U.S.C. 95A & 95B (Attachment 2). 12 U.S.C. 95A is an approximately 6 page long dissertation that, in a nutshell, states:
During time of war, the President of the United States may do anything he wants with anyone who engages in trade of any kind with one or more foreign nationals. Said person has no recourse whatsoever against whatever the President may choose to do to him or her.
12 U.S.C. 95B is a blanket approval, for all time, from March 4, 1933 onward, of whatever the President may choose to do pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 95A.
At first sight, 12 U.S.C. 95A & 95B seem to be an overly paranoid stance Congress has taken towards foreign nationals. But, using the argument that, in today's hostile world, foreign nationals are either real or potential enemies, someone could make a case for 12 U.S.C. 95A & 95B being lawfully enacted by Congress pursuant to the authority given it by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11 of the Constitution for the United States of America. After all, what good American would want to trade with enemies or potential enemies of the United States of America? This is what Congress would like everyone to believe. The reality is far different.
First, the money of account of the United States of America belongs to a private corporation called the Federal Reserve and is not, nor based on, gold and silver coin, as required by Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1; Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5 and Amendment 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America (Attachment 3). In particular, Amendment 10 requires that Congress create actual gold and silver coin in order to be acting in accordance with Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5. Furthermore, Congress, by having turned over control of the money to the Federal Reserve has violated Article 1, Section 1 and Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5 of the Constitution for the United States of America. This entire practice has rendered the money of account of the United States of America fraudulent. If you ask any employee of the Federal Reserve who its stockholders are, you will be told that the Federal Reserve is part of the United States government and is not a private corporation. Attachment 3 proves otherwise. Furthermore, Attachment 3 proves that the Federal Reserve is owned by foreign nationals and, by its own admission on its so called one dollar bill, is an enemy of the People of the United States of America! So, anyone who uses the money of account of the United States of America is trading with foreign nationals and enemies at that! Since everyone is forced to use the money of account of the United States of America, Congress has, in essence, forced all of the People of the United States of America, without knowing it, to trade with enemies and also to become fraudulently indebted to those enemies since they own that fraudulent money!
Second, the United States of America has been in a State of National Emergency, a legalese term for state of war, since March 9, 1933. See Senate Report 93-549, 93rd Congress, 1st Session (1973), "Summary of Emergency Power Statutes" for details. Congress, of course, kept secret the fact that the United States of America has been in a state of war. In fact, Congress, in every way imaginable, has tried to disguise and cover up this state of war so that nobody, other than those perpetuating the fraudulent bankruptcy, would be able to figure out that the United States of America is in a state of war. Now, remember that the so called American History teachers and textbooks said that "the United States, prior to about the year 1900, was an isolationist country in that it didn't get involved in international affairs if it could avoid doing so but that after World War 1, the United States got more and more involved in international affairs." Furthermore, some of these history textbooks referred to the United States as the "world's policeman" from World War 2 onward and talked extensively about how "the world was fortunate that the United States got involved in international affairs and became the superpower it did since, after all, the United States is the power behind the free world." Observe also, that the United States of America, since before 1933, has never been free of one form of crisis or another, to wit the following, in chronological order: (1) the Great Depression; (2) World War 2; (3) the Arms Race between the United States and the Soviet Union; (4) the Korean War; (5) the Cuban Missile Crisis; (6) the Vietnam War; (7) Operation Desert Storm and (8) the Bosnia civil war occurring at this time. Ostensibly, "the United States went through all these crises to protect the free world and to promote human rights," as stated by more than one United States President including the current one, Mr. Bill Clinton. But, look at Senate Report 93-549 and see that these "crises" are nothing other than part of an elaborate smokescreen to cover up the fact that the United States of America is in a state of war!
Now, 12 U.S.C. 95A & 95B is no longer the paranoid, but lawful, reaction by Congress to the presence of enemies or potential enemies. It has become the means by which Congress, in violation of Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution for the United States of America, has handed its legislative authority, lock, stock and barrel over to the President. Congress has, in fact, placed the entire People of the United States of America under a total dictatorship ruled over by the President! The presence and implementation of "Executive Orders" confirms it! Why does Congress still continue to maintain a presence and "pass new laws?" To keep secret the fact that the People of the United States of America are under a total dictatorship, that's why!
Once the total dictatorship created by 12 U.S.C 95A & 95B was established, our public officials only needed to corrupt the judiciary in order to completely usurp the Constitution for the United States of America and replace it, in secret of course, with the ongoing fraudulent bankruptcy of the United States of America. How did they do it?
On 25 April 1938, the United States Supreme Court, in Erie Railroad Co. vs. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, abandoned the standing precedents of law that had been in place for the 150 years prior to 1938. Specifically, that court stated:
"THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW, and CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAW applicable IN A STATE, WHETHER they be LOCAL or GENERAL in their nature, be they COMMERCIAL LAW OR a part of the LAW OF TORTS."The above directive by the United States Supreme Court would seem to state that Congress cannot override the law of any State in the Union, in any manner. The above directive would also seem to violate Article 6, Section 2 of the Constitution for the United States of America, since Article 1, Section 8 of that same Constitution explicitly grants certain powers to Congress. The ostensible reason for the above directive by the United States Supreme Court is to preserve the sovereignty of the several States, an action required by Amendment 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America. Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 542, regarding Erie v. Tompkins, appears to support this conclusion of preserving State sovereignty by stating:
"The landmark case holding that in an action in the Federal Court, except as to matters governed by the U.S. Constitution and Acts of Congress, the law to be applied in any case is the law of the State in which the Federal Court is situated. 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188. This case overruled Swift v. Tyson, 41 U.S. 1, 16 Pet. 1, 10 L.Ed. 865, which held that there was a body of federal common law to be applied in such cases."There are a number of problems with the above logic whose conclusion is that Erie v. Tompkins' purpose is to preserve State sovereignty.
First, the several States today are hardly sovereign. Witness the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and a multitude of other so called Federal Agencies and Departments. All of these agencies and departments routinely meddle in and direct the affairs of all of the several States, mostly in a behind the scenes manner so that the average person in the United States of America is ignorant of such activity. Second, the Constitution for the United States of America does grant Congress authority over the several States in multiple instances. Thus, the States are not sovereign entities in all matters. Examples are Article 1, Section 8; Article 4, Section 4 and Article 6, Section 2. However, Amendment 10 of this same Constitution also limits Congress' authority to only that which the Constitution explicitly grants in writing in the text of the Constitution itself, thus preserving State sovereignty from intrusions by the Federal government except in specifically defined and limited instances. One of the most important exceptions to State sovereignty is when the Constitution for the United States of America, through Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, regarding common defence and general welfare, explicitly instructs Congress to insure that the States do not ever violate any of the provisions of the Bill of Rights (ie. the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution). The States are not totally sovereign entities but the People of the United States of America are totally sovereign. Witness the Preamble to the Constitution for the United States of America, the Declaration of Independence and Amendment 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America. How funny it is that many States, including California, routinely, under State law, charge and prosecute people, by Information, for capital crimes, instead of by Grand Jury, as required by Amendment 5 of the Constitution for the United States of America.
Third, where Congress has the authority to enact a body of law pursuant to the Constitution for the United States of America, the Judicial Branch of the United States of America, under Article 3 of that same Constitution, has the authority to enforce that body of law that Congress enacted. Furthermore, Article 3 of the Constitution for the United States of America distinguishes between the laws of the United States, laws of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction and cases affecting ambassadors, consuls and other public ministers. In other words, the Constitution for the United States of America is defining a body of law that was generally known, prior to 1938, as the common law of the United States of America. This body of common law derives its style from the common law of England but its fundamental nature and intent derives from the Declaration of Independence and from the Bill of Rights. It was to establish this body of common law within the United States of America that the Founding Fathers fought the American Revolutionary War for in 1776. Prior to Erie v. Tompkins, the Judicial Branch of the United States of America, pursuant to explicit instructions given in Swift v. Tyson, faithfully enforced the common law of the United States of America. Furthermore, any matter brought into a Federal court that fell outside the bounds of that common law was simply dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to Amendment 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America (Stephen, A Treaties on the Principles of Pleading, Introduction, page 23; Hemmingway, History of Common Law Pleading as Evidence of the Growth of Individual Liberty and Power of the Courts; and 5 Alabama Law Journal 1).
The United States Supreme Court, in Erie v. Tompkins, abandoned the common law of the United States of America. Why? And what did they replace it with? First, understand that a Federal court ruling, pursuant to Article 6, Section 2 of the Constitution for the United States of America takes precedence over a State court ruling. Then, reexamine the quote from Black's Law Dictionary stated above or, more specifically, the part about Federal courts applying State law. Then, understand that the United States Supreme Court, in Cheek v. United States, 112 L.Ed.2d 617 (1991), page 622 states: "The United States Supreme Court, where possible, interprets congressional enactments so as to avoid raising serious constitutional questions." Then, remember that Congress, just 5 years prior to Erie v. Tompkins, had enacted 12 U.S.C. 95A & 95B and had insured that all of the People of the United States of America came under the provisions of the same (ie. under a dictatorship). Then, look at how deeply all levels of government intrude into the everyday lives of each and every person in the United States of America, in particular by creating a long list of "victimless crimes" and by requiring this or that license to do just about anything, including driving or even riding a bicycle! Finally, understand the nature of the courts in the United States of America today by reading about the various State Bar Associations and about the American Bar Association.
Erie v. Tompkins is the vehicle that our public officials used to apply 12 U.S.C. 95A & 95B and completely usurp the Constitution for the United States of America. By having the Federal courts rule on State law, these traitors extended their reach into the State courts as well and annihilated the sovereignty the States are supposed to have together with the protections State sovereignty is supposed to give the People from a central government removed from the People. Now, the People of the United States of America are under a total dictatorship controlled by the owners and stockholders of the Federal Reserve, by and through their agents who are posing as our public officials. There is no Congress, nor any President. Both of these entities became fraudulently bankrupt and vanished on March 9, 1933 with the advent of 12 U.S.C. 95A & 95B. Once Erie v. Tompkins was established, the same thing happened to the Judicial Branch of the United States of America and to all of the States.
The only reason that Congress, the President, and the Federal courts still continue to maintain a presence is to mislead the People of the United States of America. No doubt these traitors' masters, the owners and stockholders of the Federal Reserve, warned their servants to keep secret the fraudulent bankruptcy of the United States of America, until they could enslave the People of the United States of America in their diabolical New World Order (Attachment 3). The owners and stockholders of the Federal Reserve knew that if the People of the United States of America ever got wise to the fraudulent bankruptcy of their country, they would annihilate them and their servants! This fraudulent bankruptcy has even corrupted the police and military who are enforcing it with loaded guns and deadly force. Witness the presence of the bailiff with loaded gun in any courtroom ready to kidnap anyone who refuses to go along with the court's program.
Additional Notes:
(1) Regarding:Go to Discussion Forum. Home. Go to Internet Tidbits.Observe also, that the United States of America, since before 1933, has never been free of one form of crisis or another, to wit the following, in chronological order: (1) the Great Depression; (2) World War 2; (3) the Arms Race between the United States and the Soviet Union; (4) the Korean War; (5) the Cuban Missile Crisis; (6) the Vietnam War; (7) Operation Desert Storm and (8) the Bosnia civil war occurring at this time. Ostensibly, "the United States went through all these crises to protect the free world and to promote human rights," as stated by more than one United States President including the current one, Mr. Bill Clinton.Evidence from (classified) documents suggests that most of the above "crises" were deliberately created by our so called public officials. For example, someone warned Roosevelt of the possibility of Pearl Harbor and Roosevelt had that person put under house arrest. Regarding the so called Arms Race, see "Black Holes and Time Warps, Einstein's Outrageous Legacy" by Kip S. Thorne (page 225).(2) Regarding:
On 25 April 1938, the United States Supreme Court, in Erie Railroad Co. vs. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, abandoned the standing precedents of law that had been in place for the 150 years prior to 1938. Specifically, that court stated:It is curious to know that Roosevelt attempted to pack the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before that "landmark decision.""THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW, and CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAW applicable IN A STATE, WHETHER they be LOCAL or GENERAL in their nature, be they COMMERCIAL LAW OR a part of the LAW OF TORTS."
(3) For additional background documentation:
(A) Cathay Bank at Hawthorne and Lomita Blvds (SE corner) has foreign (Chinese or Japanese) symbols.(B) BAD, or the Dumbing of America, by Paul Fussell, in particular, page 193 where it is stated that the United States is the murder capital of the world.
(C) The John F. Kennedy murder and the subsequent coverup by the so called Warren Commission.